Group Dynamics in 12 Angry Men Essay -- Movie, Film, Twelve Angry Men

In the 1957 classic 12 Angry Men, group dynamics atomic number 18 portrayed through a jury deliberation. Group dynamics is touch on with the structure and functioning of groups as well as the different types of roles all in all(prenominal) character plays. In the film, twelve men are brought together in a room to decide whether a boy is guilty of violent death his father. The personality conflicts, the joint effort and the functioning of several minds together to research for the truth are just a few characteristics of group dynamics at work. The whole spectrum of humanity is represented in this movie, from the bigotry of juror No.10 to the coldly analytical No.4. Whether they brought good or bad qualities to the jury room, they all affected the outcome. At the outset, eleven jurors vote in favor of convicting the incriminate without even discussing a single shred of the evidence presented at the trial. When a group becomes too confident and fails to think realistically about its task, groupthink force out occur. Since it takes a longer time to communicate and reach a consensus in a group, decision making in a group is time-consuming. Therefore, when groups desire to achieve a quick decision, as several jurors were eager to do, they build riskier decisions than individuals. Since non any individual is completely accountable for the decision, members will contribute a tendency to accept more extreme solutions. Only star brave juror refused to vote guilty. Juror 8 refused to fall into the groupthink fix and ultimately saved an innocent mans life. He openly admits that he does not know whether the accused is guilty or innocent and that he finds it essential to simply talk about the case. What follows is not only a watchword of the particular facts of the case, but also an intense ex... ...quires looking at matters objectively, analyzing the evidence, and overture to a fair conclusion. And even if the jurors personal baggage was not look into at the door, the shift into positive group dynamics allowed the jury members to sweep over interpersonal conflicts and prejudices to reach consensus on the innocence of an alleged murderer. Bibliography 1. Kolb, David A., and Joyce S. Osland and Irwin Mr. Rubin. Organizational conduct An Experiential Approach. 6th edition. New Jersey Prentice Hall, 1995 Pages 98-100 2. Sarah Trenholm. Thinking through with(predicate) Communication An Introduction To The Study Of Human Communication. 2nd edition. Allyn and Bacon A Viacom Company, 1995 Pages 196 - 205 3. Damian Cannon, a analyze by. 12 Angry Men (1957) Copyright Movie Reviews UK 1997 4. Steve Rhodes, a review by. 12 Angry Men (1957) Copyright 1997 Steve Rhodes